NEWS

Metrics to Track Feature Adoption in SaaS

In a SaaS world, a new feature going live is considered a success. However, when this new feature garners no interest from users, the initial hype vanishes quickly. The mere presence of a new feature at a SaaS company does not necessarily mean that it is being used. The analytics page of a SaaS company, an automation system, or a collaboration service can be a failure despite its usefulness because of inadequate use.

This is where feature adoption metrics come in. With feature adoption measurements, product owners or founders can determine the answer to various important questions, such as:

• Are people using the functionality we have provided?
• What adds actual value, and what is being overlooked?
• How can we correlate feature engagement with retention, engagement, and revenue? 

If adoption trends are not tracked, teams may end up putting efforts into features that are not result-driven. On the other hand, by learning about adoption trends, software companies can align their onboarding process to optimize adoption rates and make adoption-driven decisions.

In this article, we will explore:

• What does feature adoption mean in SaaS
• Why adoption metrics matter
• Core metrics every SaaS team should monitor
• Tools, best practices, and common mistakes
• How to improve adoption using actionable insights

By the end, you’ll have a clear framework on how to measure and improve feature adoption to ensure each feature you release drives real user value.

What Is Feature Adoption in SaaS?

Feature adoption within SaaS refers to the degree to which users are aware of a feature’s presence and begin utilizing it within the SaaS platform, ultimately realizing the benefits of the adoption. Feature adoption is not just the presence of the said feature or the fact that the user clicked on the button once; true adoption reflects sustained, purposeful usage that becomes part of the user’s workflow.

Essentially, the question that is answered by the adoption of any feature is: Did this feature affect user behavior in a meaningful way?

Feature Adoption vs Feature Release

Many teams that build SaaS products think of “release” and “success” as synonymous for software features, where release is more of an internal process, and success is more external.

For instance:

• A release is shipping a new dashboard.
• Coming back to that same dashboard for decision-making purposes every week by the user is considered adoption. 

Without adoption, a feature, regardless of how well constructed, adds nothing to products in terms of value, retention, or increase.

The Three Stages of Feature Adoption

Feature adoption is not an event; it typically unfolds in three stages:

1. Discovery

Users become aware that the feature exists. This could be through the following:

• Onboarding flows
• In-app announcements
• Tooltips or guided tours
• Release notes or email updates

If users never discover a feature, adoption will never occur.

2. First Meaningful Use

This is when a user completes the core action that defines the feature’s value.

Examples:

• Creating their first automation
• Generating their first report
• Finish a workflow with the new features

One click or page view does not do the work. For adoption, completing the action that proves the user understands the purpose of the feature is essential.

3. Repeated and Sustained Use

True adoption only occurs when users go back to the feature repeatedly because it solves a problem.

That is where many features fail. Users may try a feature once, but then abandon it if:

• It doesn’t fit their workflow
• The value is not apparent 
• The experience is confusing or slow 

The strongest signal that a feature is delivering value is sustained usage.

What Feature Adoption Is Not

In order to accurately measure adoption, adoption must be distinguished from the misuse of indicators.

Feature adoption is not:

• Page views
• Button clicks
• Feature impressions
• Time spent on a screen without undertaking an action

These are not adoption signals; they’re engagement signals. They indicate exposure or interest, but they do not indicate value realization.

For instance:

A user accessing settings only once does not equate adoption. A person who regularly accesses and utilizes settings to customize their workflow to their needs is an adopter.

Adoption Depends on Feature Type

Not all features are adopted the same way. Understanding the role of a feature in the product is important.

Core Features

These define the product’s main value proposition, such as in a project management tool, task creation.

• Expect high adoption
• Strongly linked to their retention.

Supporting Features

These optimize or enhance core workflows, for example, filters and shortcuts.

• Moderate Adoption
• Often power-user driven

Advanced or Niche Features

Each of these serves a certain user segment, such as enterprise permissions or API access. 

• The overall adoption can be lower. 
• High value for targeted segments 

Adoption is always to be judged in context, not by raw percentages alone.

Why Clear Adoption Definitions Matter

If teams do not define what adoption means for each feature, then they open themselves up to:

• Tracking bad events
• Overestimating the success of features
• Poor product decision-making

Before tracking metrics, the following should be clearly defined by teams:

• What constitutes “using” the feature?
• What behavior indicates that a value has been realized? 
• How frequently the feature should be used to be considered adopted 

Clear definitions ensure adoption metrics reflect real user outcomes and aren’t misleading by tracking surface-level activity.

Why Tracking Feature Adoption Metrics Matters

Tracking feature adoption metrics is not an exercise in analytics for its own sake. In fact, it is the heart and soul of the discipline. If you are not tracking feature adoption metrics regularly as an organization, then you are optimizing for delivery, not impact.

Feature adoption metrics are relevant to business needs because they provide a window to translate usage of your product into pertinent business information.

1. Feature Adoption Reveals Real Product Value

Any SaaS product typically claims to help solve a set of problems. Feature adoption metrics help teams validate whether these problems exist.

If a feature is:

• Frequently used
• Revisited over time
• Embedded into daily or weekly workflows

Then it is delivering value.

If it is:

• Rarely discovered
• Used once, then ignored
• Ignored by key user segments 

It is not delivering value. 

Without adoption metrics, teams may rely on subjective feedback or assumptions. Adoption data gives teams objective feedback on what users value, rather than what teams think users ought to value.

2. Adoption Metrics Protect Against Feature Bloat

Feature bloat refers to products gathering functionality that few users depend upon. This enhances:

• Product complexity
• Maintenance costs
• Cognitive load for users
• Friction in onboarding

By tracking adoption metrics, teams can:

• Identify underused features early
• Decide whether to iterate, reposition, or retire them
• Prevent the roadmap from becoming reactive or bloated

High-performing SaaS teams routinely use adoption data to prune and refine their products, not just expand them.

3. Adoption Is a Leading Indicator of Retention

One of the most important roles of feature adoption metrics is predicting retention.

Users who adopt value-driving features:

• Churn less
• Engage more deeply
• Stay longer

In many SaaS products, retention is not driven by overall usage but by the adoption of specific features that anchor users to the product.

For example:

• In a CRM, users who adopt automation workflows are often more retained than those who only log contacts.
• In analytics tools, users who build recurring reports churn less than those who only view dashboards. 

Tracking adoption allows teams to: 

• Identify features most correlated with retention 
• Focus onboarding and education efforts on those features
• Detect early churn risk when adoption stalls

4. Adoption Metrics Improve Roadmap Prioritization

Roadmap decisions are often influenced by adoption data like:

• Loud customer requests
• Internal stakeholder views
• Intensifying rivalry

They are, however, not sufficient on their own.

Feature adoption metrics add a critical dimension, like:

• Which current features are lacking?
• What features drive the most engagement of retained users?
• Where minor enhancements could lead to significant usage gains?

This enables product leaders to determine priorities.

• Planning future activities on unused benefits or features
• The high uptake features will expand in use and value
• Enhancements targeted rather than overall rewrites

Adoption metrics can convert your roadmap from reactive to strategic.

5. Connecting Product Efforts to Revenue through Adoption

Many SaaS businesses depend on revenue growth, such as:

• Add-ons
• Expansions
• Propose modernizations

Feature usage is often the link to these revenue events.

Examples:

• To access advanced features, you need higher tiers
• Pricing tied to a particular function
• Enterprise plans are justified by administrative or security features

The failure of pricing and packaging strategies results in users’ non-adoption of revenue-driving features.

Monitoring Acceptance Metrics Aids Teams In:

• Assess if premium features warrant a price increase
• Find opportunities to upsell based on usage patterns
• Modify packaging if adoption falls short of revenue expectations

6. Adoption Metrics Align Teams Across the Organization

The product adoption metrics establish a common understanding that different teams can utilize for their work. 

• Product teams use these metrics to determine whether their features have succeeded.
• Growth teams use these metrics to improve their onboarding and activation processes. 
• Customer success teams use these metrics to assist users in discovering product value.
• Leadership uses them to assess ROI on product investments.

Teams without adoption metrics tend to pursue goals that create conflicting outcomes. The organization establishes vital business results that please users through the use of these metrics.

7. Measuring Adoption Changes Team Behavior

What teams measure shapes how they operate.

When organizations make adoption metrics visible and establish them as their top priority:

• Features are designed with usability in mind
• Onboarding is treated as part of the product, not an afterthought
• Iteration becomes normal, not a sign of failure

Adoption-focused teams deliver less product output through their work because they prefer to develop higher-quality features.

Core Metrics to Track Feature Adoption in SaaS

Effective tracking of feature adoption goes beyond just tracking clicks and views. Each metric should aim to answer a specific question about user behavior, value realization, and friction. Below are the fundamental metrics SaaS teams should track, how to calculate them, and how to act on them.

1. Feature Adoption Rate

What It Measures

• Feature adoption rate is a metric that shows the percentage of active users who have, in a certain period, tried a particular feature.

This metric answers the question: How many users are actually using this feature?

Basic Formula

• Feature Adoption Rate = (Number of Users who Used the Feature ÷ Total Number of Active Users) × 100

Example

If you have a SaaS application with the following data:

• Total active users in a month= 10,000
• Users who used the feature= 2,800

Then, the adoption rate of the feature is: 28%

Why This Metric Matters

Feature adoption rate is an important metric for gauging a feature’s success. It shows whether the feature has managed to penetrate the application’s larger user base or is confined to a niche group.

Low adoption rate could mean:

• The feature is not easily discoverable.
• The feature is not positioned correctly.
• The feature is not relevant to the majority of users.
• The feature is relevant to a very small segment of users.

High adoption rate means:

• The feature is highly relevant to the majority of users.
• The feature has a high value proposition.
• The feature has been successfully onboarded to the majority of the users.

How to Interpret the Adoption Rate Correctly

To interpret the adoption rate correctly, the adoption rate has to be considered in conjunction with other factors.

Important considerations:

• Type of feature
• Target audience 
• Time since the feature was released

For example:

• For a core feature, a 20% adoption rate is quite low.
• For a niche feature, a 20% adoption rate is high, especially if the target audience is enterprise companies.

Actionable improvements

• In-app discovery improvements such as tooltips, checklists, and contextual suggestions. 
• Educating users on the benefits of using the feature. 
• Segmenting user adoption to identify areas of high adoption versus low adoption.

2. Time to First Use (TTFU)

What it measures

• Time to First Use (TTFU) is a metric that helps you measure the time taken by the user to interact with the feature for the first time. 

This metric helps you answer the question: How fast do users reach the ‘aha’ moment of the feature?

Why it matters

The higher the time taken by the user to interact with the feature for the first time, the lower the chances of the user using the feature.

Indications of high Time to First Use:

• Poor onboarding process
• The feature is buried in the user interface
• User is not aware of the feature
• User is not aware of the use case

Indications of low Time to First Use:

• Good onboarding process
• The feature is clearly visible
• The feature is clearly relevant

Example

If you find that users are taking 14 days on average to interact with a new automation feature you have launched, but users who interact with the feature within the first 3 days of signing up have higher retention rates, you have a problem with your onboarding process.

How To Use This Metric

• Measure Time to First Use for new users and existing users
• Compare the Time to First Use of different features
• Compare the Time to First Use with retention

How To Improve This Metric

• Introduce guided walkthroughs
• Introduce onboarding checklists that trigger when the user interacts with the feature
• Trigger contextual messages based on user behavior
• Surface the feature at the time of user intent

3. Frequency of Use

What It Measures

• The frequency of use examines how frequently users interact with a feature.

In other words, it measures whether a feature is used in a repetitive cycle or only once.

How To Measure It

You can measure frequency in the following ways:

• The number of times a feature is used per user per week or month
• The percentage of users who reuse a feature multiple times

Example

• Feature A: used once a month by 80% of users
• Feature B: used once a week by 45% of users

Feature B may have a lower adoption rate, but it has a higher frequency of use.

Why Frequency Matters

High frequency of use indicates:

• The product-market fit for this feature is high
• The feature continues to provide value
• Users are developing a habit

Low frequency of use indicates:

• The feature only has one-time utility
• The feature only solves a specific problem
• There are UX issues preventing users from using it again

Actionable insights

• Identify features with low frequency of use
• Improve workflows to reduce friction
• Add reminders or automate workflows
• Consider repositioning a feature as an occasional, rather than primary, feature

4. Depth of Feature Usage

What It Measures

• Depth of usage measures the level of engagement with the capabilities of the feature, as opposed to the level of engagement with the feature itself.

In other words, are users using the full capabilities of the feature, or are they merely scratching the surface?

Examples

• For the reporting feature, basic usage could be defined as viewing the default reports, whereas deep usage could be defined as creating custom reports, scheduling exports, and sharing dashboards. 
• On the other hand, basic usage of the automation feature could be defined as creating one rule, whereas deep usage could be defined as creating multiple workflows with conditions and integrations.

Why This Matters

• Shallow usage of the product may indicate that the user does not fully understand the value of the product, that the product is too complicated, or that the onboarding process ends too soon.
• Deep usage of the product is also highly correlated with retention, expansion revenue, and power user adoption.

How To Act on Depth of Usage

To act on the depth of usage metric, you could identify where the user experience drops off from basic usage to deep usage, create a more progressive onboarding experience, and educate the user incrementally rather than as a whole.

5. Adoption by User Segment

What It Measures

This metric measures adoption through the following dimensions:

• User role: How employees of a company in different positions adopt the feature
• Company size: The usage behaviour based on the company’s scale
• Plan tier: How customers on different subscription plans, ranging from free to enterprise, use the feature
• Industry: The adoption rate of the feature across different industries
• Geography: The adoption patterns across regions, countries, or cities
• Signup cohort: Compares the groups of users who signed up at the same time, for example, users who signed up in January vs users who signed up in February

In essence, the metric measures who is using the feature and who is not.

Why Segmentation Matters

At first glance, adoption rates might seem like a simple metric. However, the truth is that adoption rates can be misleading when viewed in aggregate.

Let’s take a look at a simple example:

• Overall adoption: 35%
• Adoption among SMB users: 20%
• Adoption among enterprise users: 70%

If we were to look at adoption rates in aggregate, we might draw the wrong conclusions about the success or failure of a particular feature.

How to Use Segmentation

• Use it to tailor onboarding experiences.
• Use it to target development.
• Use it to determine whether to gate, bundle, or reposition features.

6. Drop-Off and Abandonment Points

What it measures

• Drop-off metrics measure where users are dropping off from a feature flow or are not moving towards full usage of a feature.

In other words, where are your users getting stuck or dropping off?

Example

In a 5-step setup flow, you see:

• 100% start
• 60% complete step
• 25% finish setup

What does this mean? This means you are losing users early in the process.

Why This Metric Matters

Drop-offs can indicate a variety of things, including:

• Confusing user experience
• Poor instructions
• Too much effort required
• Lack of integrations or prerequisites

How to decrease drop-offs

To decrease drop-offs, consider the following:

• Streamline workflows
• Eliminate unnecessary steps
• Provide inline instructions
• Consider delaying configuration until later

7. Adoption Retention (Sustained Adoption)

What It Measures

• Adoption retention is the measurement of the extent of adoption of a feature over a period of weeks or months following the initial adoption of the feature.

In other words, adoption retention is a way of measuring whether the feature provides lasting value, or was it just a one-time experiment?

Why It Matters

Adoption retention is important because a feature that is not retained is a false positive. On the other hand, a retained adoption is a true positive.

How to Track It

Adoption retention can be tracked in the following ways:

• Feature usage retention curves
• Percentage of users returning to the feature after X days
• Cohort-based adoption retention

Actionable Insights

Adoption retention is important because it helps you:

• Identify features that have a high adoption but low retention
• Improve the education process following the initial adoption
• Determine if the feature is actually solving a recurring problem

Engagement vs Adoption: Understanding the Difference

The most common mistake that SaaS teams make is that they equate feature adoption and engagement. Although both metrics are correlated with each other, they measure different things. Confusing one with the other may give you a misleading idea of how well your product is doing.

Understanding this concept is key to understanding feature adoption metrics.

What Engagement Measures

Engagement metrics measure how engaged users are with your product. Engagement metrics include:

• Daily/Monthly Active Users
• Login frequency
• Session duration
• Page views
• Clicks per session

Engagement metrics answer questions such as:

• Are users coming back?
• How often do users log in?
• How much time do users spend on our product?

Engagement metrics give an idea of how well your product is doing. However, it does not give an idea of what exactly users are doing or why they are doing it.

What Adoption Measures

Feature adoption metrics measure user behavior associated with feature value.

The questions this metric answers include:

• Are users using this feature at all?
• Are users using this feature multiple times?
• Are users actually using the feature to perform the actions that create value?

Adoption is a more specific, deeper measure. It looks at whether or not the feature has been integrated into the workflow of the user.

Why High Engagement Can Hide Poor Adoption

It is entirely possible, and indeed common, that a SaaS product will have high engagement while simultaneously having poor adoption.

Example:

• Users are logging in daily to use the product.
• There is a new feature related to automation, but it is not being used.
• High engagement, but the product is not innovating.

In this scenario:

• The product has high engagement.
• The product has poor adoption.

This is why relying on engagement metrics alone can be dangerous. It can cause teams to believe that their features are succeeding when, in reality, they are not.

Feature Level Focus Fosters Better Decisions

By tracking this at a feature level, teams can measure each feature individually, rather than relying on averages of all features combined. 

This enables teams to:

• Identify features that improve long-term retention
• Identify features that are quietly failing
• Improve or remove features that are failing
• Leverage features that encourage habit development

Without this level of data, product decisions are made based on averages, which can hide critical information. 

Engagement Supports Adoption but Can’t Replace It

Engagement and Adoption are complementary metrics:

• Engagement shows if users are using the product
• Adoption shows if users are getting value from the product

Engagement without Adoption:

• Can lead to a shallow user experience
• Can slow down growth
• Limits upsell opportunities

Adoption, in turn, is likely to improve engagement, but the reverse is not true. 

Example:

A project management application:

• Engagement: Users log in four times a week
• Adoption: Only 18% of users are using the application’s automation feature
• Retention: Those using the feature have 40% lower churn

Without adoption, it would be assumed that the feature is unimportant. With adoption, it is clear that improving this feature would have a large impact on retention. 

How to Use this Distinction in Product Development

To keep this in mind:

• Use engagement metrics to measure the success of the entire application
• Use adoption metrics to measure the success of individual features
• Always tie adoption to a downstream effect, such as retention, expansion, or satisfaction

How Feature Adoption Impacts Retention and Revenue

Feature adoption is not only a product metric but a business metric. The features that users end up adopting have a direct impact on the value that users derive from the product, which in turn has a direct impact on whether the user retains the product.

Low adoption makes it difficult for the product to scale, regardless of how well the product is designed. High adoption of the right features, on the other hand, can lead to compound growth in terms of customer retention.

1. Feature Adoption as a Driver of Retention

In SaaS, customer retention is not based on the general usage of the product. It is based on the ability of the customer to successfully adopt the features that solve the customer’s problems.

Users will churn when:

• They do not derive value quickly
• They do not utilize the core features of the product
• They do not find the advanced features useful

Adoption metrics help teams understand which features are the “anchor” that keeps the customer engaged.

Example: Adoption-Based Retention

In most SaaS products, the adoption of a key feature is the difference between retaining the customer and losing the customer. 

For instance:

• On an analytics platform, users who create recurring reports have higher retention than users who only view reports.
• In a CRM, users who set up automation workflows have higher retention compared to users who do not.

Through this, they can:

• Identify high-impact features
• Target onboarding for those features
• Detect potential churn with stalled feature adoption

2. Adoption as a Leading Indicator of Churn

Adoption metrics typically change before churn.

A decrease in feature adoption may represent:

• A change in user need
• Increased friction
• Competition for the customer
• Poor performance of the feature

Adoption metrics are more detailed than retention metrics, thus allowing for earlier intervention.

Some applications:

• Initiate customer success efforts based on non-adoption of key features
• Identify accounts based on decreased adoption
• Intervene before the customer becomes disengaged

3. Feature Adoption and Revenue Growth

Revenue expansion for many SaaS businesses relies on the adoption of more advanced or higher-end features.

This may include:

• Advanced analytics
• Automations/integrations
• Collaboration/admin features
• Usage-based features

If the customer is not adopting these features, they are likely not expanding.

Through this, the business can:

• Validate the value of premium features for pricing
• Identify natural upsell opportunities based on customer behavior
• Refine packaging and plan differentiation

4. Adoption as a Guide for Pricing and Packaging

Adoption data sometimes shows that the value customers get for the price they pay is not aligned.

Some common issues that may arise include:

• A feature included in the paid plans has low adoption even among the paying customer base.
• A popular feature is behind the paywall.
• Adoption is high, but the customer doesn’t see it as a premium value.

Some possible solutions include:

• Re-bundling features
• Changing pricing models
• Changing the limits set for plans

Pricing based on adoption data tends to be more aligned with customer value.

5. Adoption Drives Customer Lifetime Value (LTV)

LTV improves when customers:

• Adopt value-creating features early on.
• Use the features over time.
• Use the features in more ways.

Adoption helps teams understand:

• Which features drive LTV
• How quickly must you adopt features to drive LTV
• Which customer behaviors predict LTV

This helps teams optimize the onboarding process for maximum LTV.

6. Adoption Generates a Growth Feedback Loop

When feature adoption is high, growth accelerates because:

• Engaged users provide more feedback
• Satisfied users refer more users
• Power users become ambassadors
• Expansion of revenue funds leads to more innovation

When adoption is low, the feedback loop doesn’t work.

Adoption metrics ensure that growth is built on real value, not just the addition of new customers.

Tools to Track Feature Adoption Metrics

Tracking feature adoption is more complex. SaaS teams require systems that are capable of tracking user behavior well, segmenting user behavior meaningfully, and providing actionable insights. Rather than focusing on specific vendors, it is more important to understand the different categories of tools and capabilities that are essential for tracking feature adoption well.

1. Product Analytics Platforms

Product analytics platforms are the foundation of feature adoption tracking. These platforms collect data at the event level, allowing companies to understand user behavior and feature interaction within the product.

The essential capabilities of product analytics platforms include:

• Event tracking for interactions with features
• User identification and session tracking
• Funnel analysis
• Cohort analysis
• Behavioral segmentation

To measure feature adoption well, companies need to define the following:

• The event that signifies the first meaningful use
• The events that signify repeated or continued use
• The events that signify the depth of use

If these events are not well defined, even the best product analytics platforms will not be able to provide accurate feature adoption metrics.

2. Event Taxonomy and Data Hygiene

To track feature adoption well, companies need to define and name events well.

Best practices in event taxonomy and data hygiene include:

• Using consistent event naming conventions
• Distinguishing between passive and active events
• Controlling versions of events over time
• Sharing event definitions among product and analytics teams

Examples of well-defined events include:

• “Viewed automation page” is not an adoption
• “Created first automation rule” is an adoption

If events are not well defined, feature adoption metrics will not be reliable.

3. Funnels for Adoption Analysis

Funnels are essential in feature adoption tracking. Funnels help companies understand where users are dropping out along the way from discovery to adoption.

Common feature adoption funnels include:

• Discover feature, interact with feature, complete core action
• Start setup, complete setup, complete first outcome
• Start trial, configure feature, use feature

Funnels reveal:

• Where users get stuck
• Where users drop out
• How changes improve completion rates

Funnels are essential in improving user onboarding and reducing time to first value.

4. Cohort Analysis for Adoption Over Time

Cohorts are groups of users who share certain characteristics, like when they signed up, what version of a feature they saw, what kind of plan they had, or how well onboarding went. This way of thinking about cohorts helps us:

• Evaluate how different cohorts are doing over time
• Understand how changes to onboarding or user experience might be impacting adoption
• Monitor adoption over time, rather than at a single point in time

Example:

People who signed up after a new walkthrough tend to get a feature more quickly.

Older cohorts might be showing lower adoption, meaning we need to re-engage those users.

5. Segmentation Abilities

Segmentation is a crucial aspect in helping us understand who we are actually measuring adoption metrics for. Good segmentation will take into consideration:

• User roles or job functions
• Company size or type
• Industry or use cases
• Lifecycle or maturity

If we don’t think about segmentation, we might end up optimizing for averages rather than meaningful user groups.

6. Dashboards and Reporting

Dashboards allow the team to observe the patterns of adoption and keep everyone on the same page with the same metrics. A good adoption dashboard should include:

• Adoption rate by feature
• Time to first use
• Adoption retention curves
• Adoption by user segment
• Drop-off points in key funnels

A good dashboard should be:

• Easy to quickly understand
• Based on well-defined terms
• Reviewed frequently, not just after launch

7. Qualitative Feedback Tools

Adoption metrics are good, but they are best used with qualitative data. Qualitative data can be collected through:

• Interviews with users
• Surveys within the application
• Support requests
• Feedback mechanisms

This helps understand why adoption is high or low.

8. Internal Alignment and Access

Useful insights are those that are shared. 

Best practices include:

• Ensuring the product, growth, and customer success teams have access to the adoption data
• Using shared dashboards with universal definitions
• Discussing adoption metrics during regular product reviews

Let the metrics drive the decisions, not just after the feature launch.

Common Mistakes SaaS Teams Make When Measuring Adoption

Even teams that strive to measure their feature adoption often misinterpret what adoption really means. Such misreads often cause product decisions to stray off course or squander time on the wrong priorities.

1. Blending Exposure with Adoption: Adoption should not be measured by page views, impressions, or clicks. Seeing something does not mean that someone is using that feature. Adoption should be based on some action that is valuable, not on how visible something is.
2. Pursuing Vanity Metrics: Adoption metrics such as total events or average session length are impressive, but do not mean that the feature is solving a problem. Vanity metrics allow underperforming features to fly under the radar instead of exposing them for what they really are.
3. Failing to Define What “Adopted” Really Means: Adoption metrics should be consistent. Each feature should have a “core action” that defines adoption. Each core action should be clearly defined to ensure that there is no confusion about what adoption really means.
4. Forgetting to Segment by User Type: Adoption metrics should be segmented by user type. A feature might be great for large enterprises but useless for smaller businesses. Adoption metrics should be segmented to get the whole picture.
5. Trying to Track Too Many Metrics at One Time: Adoption metrics should be few but very relevant to the product. Trying to track too many metrics at one time causes information to be scattered. Having a few, but very relevant, adoption metrics will help to stay on course.
6. Blaming Low Adoption for Failure: Adoption metrics should not be used to delete a feature. Low adoption might mean that there are onboarding issues or that the timing is off.

How to Improve Feature Adoption Using Data Insights

Feature adoption increases when teams use data as an iterative compass, not just a scorecard. Let adoption metrics inform design, onboarding, and what to build next.

1. Begin with high-impact features: Graph adoption data together with retention and revenue. Focus improvement efforts on features that demonstrate a clear relationship to long-term engagement or growth potential, rather than just the latest releases.
2. Focus onboarding on providing value: Use time-to-first-use and drop-off data to optimize onboarding. Quickly direct users to the feature’s primary action and eliminate steps that slow progress toward value.
3. Unstick users at points of friction: Analyze where users abandon onboarding or become stuck in progress. Simplify workflows, clarify instructions, and offer context-specific help exactly when users need it.
4. Personalize by segment: Users follow different adoption curves. Tailor onboarding, messaging, and feature promotion to each segment so users see the features relevant to their interests.
5. Lock in value after the first use: First use is no guarantee of long-term adoption. Follow up with in-app guidance, educational content, or automation that encourages repeat use and deeper exploration.
6. Improve by iterative data: Conduct A/B testing on UI, workflows, or messaging, and see how adoption metrics change. Use data to prove improvements rather than intuition.

FAQs About SaaS Feature Adoption Metrics

1. What is a good feature adoption rate for SaaS applications?

While there isn’t a specific universal number that is applicable across the board, the adoption rate of a feature is considered good if the feature is meant for a specific purpose and is being utilized by the right audience. Features that are more critical and core in nature should be adopted by a majority of the audience, whereas features that are more advanced and specific may have a lower adoption rate but still provide significant value to the audience.

2. How long should feature adoption take?

While the adoption time for a feature may vary depending on the feature itself, the general guideline is to minimize the time to the first use of a feature and show a steady increase in the adoption rate over time.

3. Do all SaaS features need to have a high feature adoption rate?

While that is not the case, the success of a feature is based on whether the right audience is using the feature.

4. How do we track feature adoption for new users?

Cohort analysis is a good way to track the adoption rate of a feature for new users. For new users, the time to first use and repeat use are the most critical factors.

Final Thoughts

Feature adoption represents a strong indicator that the product is indeed providing value. While adding new features continues the product roadmap, the actual adoption of those features represents whether they indeed provide value to the user. By focusing on metrics like adoption rate, time to first use, and how often the user adopts the feature, product development teams can move beyond the surface level and determine what areas of the product provide the greatest value.

By utilizing feature adoption metrics to guide product development, the emphasis is no longer on the quantity but on the quality. The success of a SaaS product is not measured by the number of features created, but the number of times the user returns to the feature that solved the problem.